Cyber Crime Examine Challenging Laws
By Prempal Singh
Technology and a policy of having isolated networks have relied on seriously to ensure cyber security. Little has been said about the role of the individual in this matter.
The attitude of users is one of the extremely significant obstacles to obtaining fully secure systems.
Users prefer to acquire or use more software features that assist their work but place little value on security features. In reality, these security features may cause a qualification of trouble, resulting in users keeping away from them.
We should not define the objective of cyber security as building an impenetrable safe container to prevent malicious attacks and security breaches.
Many of these an objective would require practically infinite amounts of resources, which could cause a loss in productivity or in immense inconvenience.
We can learn from real-world parallels. We have security systems like window framework, doors and locks to keep our homes secure.
But it really is my firm belief that the low crime rate in Singapore is mainly because of the ability of our police force and the strong preemption from corrective laws and measures, alternatively than the strength of the locks.
Likewise, the behavior of would-be cyber criminals can be stored under control with deterrence actions such as security features and punishment.
Education can also play an important role in correcting users’ behavior.
Users should be educated about cybersecurity and taught basic internet hygiene habits, such as clearing cookies.
They should also be made aware of the idea functions that accompany decisions which may cause them to fall prey to cyber crime, such as phishing.
Confidently, they can be motivated to consider more focused and rule-governed decision-making when it comes to visiting websites and opening attachments.
Source: www.straitstimes.com