CALL US

+91 8219776763

Proposed new cybercrime police post recommended by council, despite concerns over civil liberties | Cyberops

Proposed new cybercrime police post recommended by council, despite concerns over civil liberties

By Prempal Singh 0 Comment February 22, 2017

The legislature’s Establishment Subcommittee has voted in favor of a government proposal to create a long lasting post in the police’s cyber crime bureau.The additional post requires a new chief superintendent serving in the Internet Security and Technology Criminal offenses Bureau. The proposed regular salary ranges from around HK$140,000 to HK$153,000 On.

The additional post requires a new chief superintendent serving in the Internet Security and Technology Criminal offenses Bureau. The proposed regular salary ranges from around HK$140,000 to HK$153,000 On Tuesday, the subcommittee approved the proposal in a 15:7 election. It will eventually recommend the proposition to the Finance Panel, containing the final say on the situation.

The new senior officer will be tasked with supervising the bureau’s procedure and execution of strategies in taking the “growing challenges” in cyber security, the safety Bureau said in a document submitted to the legislature.

The bureau cited a “significant” increase in reports of technology crimes during the previous 15 years, from 272 cases in 2002 to 4, 537 cases recently. It estimated that cybercrime led to around HK$1.87 billion worth of financial losses last year, compared to HK$60,000 in 2010.

The Protection Bureau made the same proposal in 2014, but it was voted down by the legislature in 2015.

Accessing computers with the dishonest purpose.

Earlier this month, the Establishment Subcommittee saw a heated controversy over the proposal, as lawmakers expressed concern at potential abuses of a cybercrime law under Section 161 of the Criminal activity Ordinance. What the law states criminalize those accessing computers with a “dishonest intent.” Pro-democracy lawmakers were worried that the law may be abused to make politics prosecutions and suppress flexibility of speech.

Despite lawmakers’ requests, the Security Bureau and police refused to classify prosecutions and {croyance|vérité|dogme} made under the {legislation|regulation|rules} by {the sort of} crimes. This cited an absence of resources as justification.

Chung Siu-Yeung, an associate commissioner of police, also suggested the lawmakers check news reports and {courtroom|the courtroom|court docket} cases for facts.

In response, Civic Party legislator Kwok Ka-ki slammed Chung for his “irresponsible” frame of mind and disregard for the legislature’s duty to screen the work of the government.

IT sector legislator Charles Mok described the cybercrime law as “the real Internet Article twenty-three,” discussing the debatable security law encoded in the Basic Law. “There have only been about a hundred prosecutions, however, you refuse to categorize them, citing an absence of resources, ” Mok said. “We simply want to know how many of the cases engaged [online] presentation. ”

Undersecretary for Secureness John Lee Ka-chiu assured to study the feasibility of categorizing cases related to the law in the requested manner.

Shelter said Tuesday that it was illogical for the lawmakers to bring up the cybercrime law in the discussion of whether or not to create a new cyber law enforcement post in the pressure.

According to the numbers provided by authorities to the Establishment Subcommittee, a total of 180 prosecutions were made under Section 161 of the Criminal activity Ordinance between 2012 and 2014, leading to 162 convictions. However, the numbers are not categorized by the sort of crimes.

Source: honkongfp.com

error: Content is protected by Cyberops !!